The price of silence: indemnity on a party/party basis
The NSW Supreme Court has found that an insured’s failure to seek the insurer’s prior written consent to incur costs in connection with legal proceedings did not preclude the insured from being indemnified for those costs under the policy. However, the insured’s failure to comply with the terms of the policy influenced the court’s decision to award costs on a party/party, rather than indemnity, basis.
Pandurevic v Southern Cross Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 3)  NSWSC 1601 indicates that the insurer’s failure to draw the insured’s attention to certain critical policy terms during the claims process may make it difficult for the insurer to rely on those terms in later proceedings to justify a denial of indemnity…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out