The new Planning Court, revised planning guidance, restated green belt policy and what constitutes a screening opinion
By Jan Hebblethwaite
As mentioned in our alert of November/December 2013, a new and specialist Planning Court is being created. It will open for business on 6 April 2014, as part of the High Court. The court will be overseen by a planning liaison judge and will hear planning-related judicial review and statutory challenges, including claims relating to: planning permissions and other development consents; enforcement; applications under the Transport and Works Act 1992; wayleaves; highways and other rights of way; compulsory purchase orders; town and village greens; EU environmental legislation and domestic transpositions; and national, regional or other planning policy documents, statutory or otherwise.
Any claim relating to such a matter, which is commenced after 6 April 2014, should be issued in the Planning Court. Any claims already under way as at that date will be automatically transferred to the new court…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Also: collateral purpose of winding-up petition is not an abuse of process; and more.
…despite representation and warranty to the contrary. A helpful decision for lenders