The Lush v Amazon dispute, continued
In its April newsletter, Walker Morris reported that Lush had succeeded in its action against Amazon, preventing the latter from using its trademark to promote rival goods for sale on Amazon’s website and via Google. The High Court ruled that Amazon had infringed Lush’s trademark by suggesting to users of its internal search engine, and in sponsored search results, that Lush goods were offered for sale on its site when they weren’t.
Following the ruling, the two companies attempted — and failed — to reach an agreement as to the form of the court order. Accordingly, the form of the order was referred back to the High Court for a ruling…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The Department of Energy & Climate Change has published the final allocation framework for the October 2014 contracts-for-difference allocation round.
The courts have decided a number of high-profile cases this summer in which retailers have been involved in intellectual property disputes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents