The Lush v Amazon dispute, continued

In its April newsletter, Walker Morris reported that Lush had succeeded in its action against Amazon, preventing the latter from using its trademark to promote rival goods for sale on Amazon’s website and via Google. The High Court ruled that Amazon had infringed Lush’s trademark by suggesting to users of its internal search engine, and in sponsored search results, that Lush goods were offered for sale on its site when they weren’t.

Following the ruling, the two companies attempted — and failed — to reach an agreement as to the form of the court order. Accordingly, the form of the order was referred back to the High Court for a ruling…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.



Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Walker Morris

View more briefings from Walker Morris

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Kings Court
12 King Street

Turnover (£m): 42.50
No. of lawyers: 188