The long slow death of dual employment contracts
Last week the bound version of the Finance Act 2014 thudded onto my desk. Not an exciting publication and, for the uninitiated, about as satisfying to read as the London telephone directory (and perhaps a little less useful).
When I started practising tax law the Finance Act was a slender affair, perhaps the size of Woman’s Weekly, and it took you no more than an afternoon to digest its contents. The latest iteration weighs in at 640 pages, containing some 303 sections and 39 (count them) schedules. It would take, if you were so minded, a whole week to read through and believe me that’s a week of your life you would never get back.
The reality is that our politicians and public servants cannot resist adding more and more code to our tax system, making it the longest and probably the most complex in the world. I’m going to spare you all the details of the 2014 Act and will, instead, focus on one part: Section 15 and Schedule 3 (they love their schedules) relating to dual employment contracts…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s litigation reporter looks at the ongoing saga of the Tchenguiz litigation
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe