The long arm of the law — freestanding Mareva injunctions and clarification from the Court of Appeal
On 4 June 2013, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in VTB Capital PLC v Universal Telecom Management (unreported) (VTB). This decision, given subsequent to our earlier briefing, provides further clarity as to the extent of the CaymanCourt’s jurisdiction to grant freestanding Mareva injunctions (also known as ‘freezing injunctions’).
A Mareva injunction is an in personam order (made against a person) restraining a defendant from dissipating or otherwise dealing with its assets. There are four situations in which such injunctions are sought.
Most commonly, they are sought by a plaintiff that is pursuing substantive claims (eg a claim for damages). Such injunctions prevent defendants from rendering themselves judgment-proof by dissipating or hiding their assets during the period between the commencement of the claim and the eventual judgment…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.