The jury rules on gambling advertising
With decision n. 25/2013 issued on 9 April 2013, the Advertising and Marketing Communication Self-Regulation Authority (the jury) took position on the interpretation of section 28 ter of the Self Regulation Code of Marketing Communication (CMC) relating to gaming and gambling advertisements.
Said provision is set to protect individuals from the adverse effects of non-responsible gambling. It provides that gambling commercials shall not encourage or otherwise invite the public to gamble as a way to solve psychological or financial problems. According to section 28 ter of the CMC, such ads shall also include a warning that gambling is illegal for under-age individuals.
In the case, the Review Board, which is the jury’s body acting for the protection of the general interests of consumers, claimed that the opponent’s commercial, also including statements such as ‘win up to €8m, withdraw them now’, was capable of improperly promoting gambling games…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
In the two kinds of insurance (’loss occurrence’ and ’claims made’), the risk linked to the premium is different.
The ECJ’s recent decision is characterised by a wide interpretation of two constitutive elements of the producer liability for defective product.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms