The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group: AML final guidance for consumer credit providers
Following consultation on 29 January 2014, on 11 March 2014 the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group’s (JMSLG’s) board approved the final guidance for consumer credit firms relating to their compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) obligations. This was published on 20 March 2014.
This amends the JMLSG’s AML and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) guidance for the financial services sector by inserting a new chapter 11a (consumer credit providers) into the sector-specific guidance in Part II and is produced in the context of the Financial Conduct Authority’s assumption of responsibility for supervising such firms’ compliance with the AML obligations from 1 April 2014.
The guidance has been amended to set out and clarify consumer credit providers’ duties for compliance with money laundering and terrorist financing risks. It also provides guidance on assessing the risk of money laundering and carrying out customer due diligence…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Landlords must protect tenants’ deposits and provide tenants with prescribed information, regardless of when the tenancy commenced and when the deposit was received.
In the Yam Seng case, the court was willing to imply a duty of good faith to give business efficacy to a commercial contract. Since that case, the law has been somewhat uncertain.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.