The Jackson Reforms: update
By Clare Kempkens
The Jackson Reforms refer to the wide-ranging changes to the civil litigation procedure brought into the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) in April 2013 following Sir Rupert Jackson’s review into the costs of civil litigation in England.
In our previous article on the subject on 11 June 2014, we noted that the Court of Appeal had listed three appeals, relating to the principles established in the landmark decision in Mitchell to be heard together later that month and had invited the Law Society and the Bar Council to intervene. The Mitchell decision concerns the circumstances in which the courts will grant a party relief from the sanctions that will otherwise be imposed for a failure to comply with any rule or practice direction of the CPR or a court order.
The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment on 4 July 2014…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The recent judgment in the Longchamp case has overturned accepted industry thinking in how bunkers and crew wages are dealt with in a hijacking.
Much will no doubt be written about the main provisions of the new Counter Terrorism and Security Bill.