The Jackson Reforms: a sea change in the conduct of civil litigation in the UK
By Bob Deering
The Jackson civil litigation reforms, which came into force in April 2013, represent a sea change in the way litigation is conducted in the UK and affect everyone involved in commercial litigation in England, not just the lawyers. Our article provides an update on how the reforms have affected the litigation of commercial disputes in the English courts in the past 15 months, specifically in relation to case management and controlling costs.
In 2009, Sir Rupert Jackson, a senior Court of Appeal judge, was asked to carry out a review into the costs of civil litigation in England. The resulting changes to civil litigation procedure were brought into the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) in April 2013 and have become known as ‘the Jackson Reforms’.
Sir Rupert’s reforms involve a number of key changes. The most relevant to commercial disputes are the expansion of permitted contingency fee arrangements; increases to damages where a defendant fails to beat a claimant’s settlement offer; and the recent introduction in the Commercial Court in April 2014 of ‘costs budgeting’, under which a judge will approve at an early stage in the case a budget in respect of the future costs of the case…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
A carrier, whose containers had been detained for a long time and seemed to be unlikely to be returned, was found not to have the right to daily liquidated damages for an open-ended period.
The orthodox view is that damages are limited to losses suffered during the overrun period only. Similar issues were explored in a recent judgment from the Commercial Court in the Great Creation.