The importance of setting out the scope of a retainer and an adviser’s duty of care
The case of Richard Gabriel v Peter Little, High Tech Design & Build Ltd, Whiteshore Associates Ltd, BPE Solicitors, BPE Solicitors LLP ( EWCA Civ 1513) has highlighted the importance of engagement letters in clarifying the scope of a professional retainer.
Mr Gabriel lent the sum of £200,000 to Whiteshore, secured on a property known as Building 428. The facility letter provided for repayment of the principal sum, together with an additional ‘return’ of £70,000, in March 2009. Mr Little owned a 50 per cent share of Whiteshore and he was a director of the company. BPE acted for Mr Gabriel in relation to the loan transaction.
The facility letter that had been drawn up by BPE stated that the purpose of the loan was ‘to assist with the costs of the development of the property’. However, the money was actually used by Whiteshore to purchase the property from High Tech (Mr Little’s principal company)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
CoA also rejects invitations from the parties to refer various questions of law to Europe.
What protection does a Community Trade Mark confer? And how far does the own name defence extend? The Court of Appeal of England and Wales was split in a recent case.