The importance of being adverse: squatters
Making a claim for adverse possession is a method by which an ‘unlawful’ occupier can acquire legal title to the land, by ‘displacing’ the paper owner. Adverse possession can be relied upon by squatters residing in a property or making use of a piece of land for the requisite length of time.
The case of Robert Smart v Lambeth London Borough Council concerned a claim for adverse possession, which was said to have arisen by virtue of occupation for a period of at least 12 years prior to 1993, but the principle considered in the case applies equally to any claim for adverse possession.
The case involved properties in Clapham, London, which in 1971 were acquired by Lambeth London Borough Council. Following acquisition, the properties were left vacant and squatters took possession. Rather than evict the squatters, the council decided to re-house them in the occupied properties. With the agreement and involvement of the squatters, the council granted a licence to a housing association, which, in turn, gave the housing association permission to grant licences to occupy (in a specified form only) to the squatters…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.