The impact of inter partes review on patent litigation
The America Invents Act (AIA) created a new post-grant review proceeding in the USPTO: the inter partes review or IPR. On 16 September, 2012, the USPTO stopped accepting petitions for inter partes re-examination and the IPR took its place.
IPR, like inter partes re-examination before it, allows the USPTO to reconsider the patentability of a patent. There are some key differences between an IPR and prior post-grant proceedings. For an IPR to be instituted, the USPTO must conclude there is ‘a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail’ in at least one of the claims; a more stringent standard than the old ‘significant new question of patentability’.
An IPR is conducted before the new USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), not an examiner, eliminating one layer of proceedings. Invalidity need only be proven by preponderance of the evidence, a lower standard than the federal court ‘clear and convincing’ standard…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The US Supreme Court has invalidated federal aggregate limits on individual political contributions in the case McCutcheon et al v Federal Election Commission.
Law à la Mode — April 2014: fashion flair transforms wearable technologies; delivering IT services in the retail sector; and more
DLA Piper has released the April 2014 issue of its Law à la Mode publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery