The future of DNA patents
By Lisa A Haile
The US Supreme Court has ruled that certain patent claims owned by Myriad Genetics, the US biotech company that holds the patents covering a test for breast cancer-related genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2), are invalid as products of nature.
The implications for this decision, handed down on 13 June, may not be as far reaching in the biopharma industry as some have speculated. The decision is not likely to deter the innovation that is driving critical discoveries and therapies in the sector. In a decision that leaves some important questions unanswered, the Court both took away and left certain subject matter intact as patent eligible.
Full genes as excised from the genome, including coding and non-coding regions as they ‘occur naturally’, are no longer patentable. However, genes that have been manipulated in the lab (e.g, cDNA) are patentable and valid…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The same day he took the reins as chief judge for the District of Delaware, Judge Leonard P Stark substantially overhauled his patent practices.
The purpose of this bulletin is to highlight the fact that certain real burdens will be automatically extinguished on 28 November 2014.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions