The future of carbon policy in Australia — direct action or ETS lite?
By Allison Warburton
It is just possible that solving global poverty may prove easier than securing a global response to climate change.
Australia, like many first-world nations, has grappled with its policy response to climate change for well more than a decade. The issue is a particularly difficult one for this country, with its relatively low population base, an economy that is heavily reliant on fossil fuels and a range of industries that compete in a global marketplace. Political parties of both persuasions have struggled to develop carbon policies that deliver real reductions in emissions but do not place too high an economic burden on industry.
Businesses, for their part, have since the mid-2000s been largely accepting of the need for emissions-reduction measures. The fairly constant message from industry groups has been that they are willing to accept a carbon price provided they get certainty of policy, to allow them to plan investments going forward. What businesses actually got was a carbon price, but no certainty…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The Draft Report of the Competition Policy Review aims to set the pathway for resuscitating productivity growth in Australia.
The High Court has handed down its decision in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker — ruling that the implied term of trust and confidence is not part of Australian law.