The FCC’s declaratory ruling re TCPA vicarious liability — one year later: trends and takeaways
By Perrie Michael Weiner and Patrick Hunnius
A year ago, we reported on the Federal Communications Commssion’s (FCC’s) declaratory ruling that addressed the issue of whether parties who did not actually place telemarketing robocalls could be either directly or vicariously liable for calls made on their behalf in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
How has the declaratory ruling been applied since then? Seeking to understand significant trends and identify takeaways for businesses aiming to avoid vicarious liability exposure risk, we took a careful look at 12 federal court decisions issued since then.
In its ruling, the FCC clarified that sellers who did not actually place calls cannot be directly liable under sections 227(b) and (c) of the act and could only be held vicariously liable under these sections if federal common law principles of agency apply. Vicarious liability, according to the FCC, may only derive from formal agency, apparent authority or ratification…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Facing the looming economic threat: third parties retain the right to intervene in threatened industrial action
Third parties have retained the recently acquired right to intervene to protect their interests in the face of threatened industrial action.
The Australian Securities Exchange has released an updated version of Guidance Note 17 to the ASX listing rules. This article sets out some of the changes to the original note.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions