The EU and the US — conflicting agendas on geographical indications: what is happening in Asia

This paper presumes knowledge of general background to the differences between the EU and the US in relation to geographical indications (GIs).

The US and the EU are both competing in Asia to promote their different approaches to the protection of GIs. The roots of the problem are to be found in the World Trade Organization (WTO) where the US and the EU have agendas for the Doha negotiations, which, for the moment at least, have precluded the possibility of agreement.

In the absense of agreement in the WTO, both the US and the EU are pursuing their seperate objectives through bi-lateral and/or pluri-lateral deals…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below. 

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from NCTM

View more briefings from NCTM

Analysis from The Lawyer


Via Agnello 12

Turnover (€m): 77.00
Jurisdiction: Italy