The EU and the US — conflicting agendas on geographical indications: what is happening in Asia
This paper presumes knowledge of general background to the differences between the EU and the US in relation to geographical indications (GIs).
The US and the EU are both competing in Asia to promote their different approaches to the protection of GIs. The roots of the problem are to be found in the World Trade Organization (WTO) where the US and the EU have agendas for the Doha negotiations, which, for the moment at least, have precluded the possibility of agreement.
In the absense of agreement in the WTO, both the US and the EU are pursuing their seperate objectives through bi-lateral and/or pluri-lateral deals…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from NCTM
Briefings from NCTM
Shipping and Transportation Bulletin: circumvention of anti-dumping duties; concession fees; and more
NCTM comments on a recent EGC judgment dealing with circumvention of anti-dumping duties, a subject that has become quite frequent in international trade.
The EU Court of Justice has shed new light on the issue of trademark genericisation by drawing the boundaries of the concept of ‘relevant public’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms