The efficacy of the preliminary contract and its relation with the final contract
Through judgement no. 6093, issued on 5 June 2012, the Court of Cassation intervened to clarify certain legal problems underlying the relation existing between the preliminary contract and the final contract.
More specifically, the Supreme Court, having been asked to issue a ruling on a case of future sale of real estate, carried out an analysis to establish whether the preliminary contract only produces the reciprocal obligation of the parties to enter into the final contract, the provisions of which might not conform with those agreed between the parties in the preliminary contract, or whether, conversely, it continues to be the sole source of contractual rights and obligations between the parties.
In the case examined by the court, two parties had entered into a preliminary contract the subject of which was the future sale of land with annexed building. The final contract subsequently entered into by the same parties did not contain any reference to a specific parcel which had, conversely, characterised the subject of the preliminary contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
In Italy, measures have been taken to preserve the continuity of operation of industrial plants of national strategic interest.
Can the admission to concordato preventivo be revoked if creditors, informed by the judicial commissioner of fraudulent acts, approved the proposal of the debtor?
The Italian Supreme Court ruled that the disclosure of acts in fraud carried out by the debtor causes the admission to concordato preventivo to be revoked according to Article 173 IBL, even in case of approval by the creditors.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms