The duty on CCGs following R (Elizabeth Rose) v Thanet Clinical Commissioning Group
In Rose, the Administrative Court considered whether a clinical commissioning group (CCG) had acted unlawfully in failing to follow guidance issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), even though it was under no statutory duty to do so.
The court found that, even in the absence of any statutory duty, CCGs can choose not to follow NICE guidance only where there is some special factor that exceptionally justifies them in doing so. Merely disagreeing with the guidance is not enough.
The claimant, Elizabeth Rose, is a 25-year-old woman who has suffered from a severe form of Crohn’s disease since she was 14. Her condition had deteriorated and her doctors recommended bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy to hopefully bring the disease into remission. Infertility and the early onset of the menopause are probable outcomes of such treatment…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Dispute resolution in the UAE: what are the options? Part three — enforcing an arbitration award in the UAE
Different regimes apply in the UAE for enforcing international awards and local awards (i.e. awards made within the UAE).
Employers with recognised trade unions are seeing more pressure coming their way in relation, on the one hand, to job security and on the other to improved terms and conditions.