The courts begin to drive home the Jackson message
In its newsflash of 27 November 2013, Hogan Lovells reported on the ground-breaking case of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers. In the Mitchell case, the Court of Appeal made clear that the Jackson regime for civil litigation had ushered in a whole new culture of conducting litigation, in which parties that failed to meet procedural deadlines or to comply with rules and court orders could henceforth expect little sympathy from the courts.
It is up to a party that has failed to comply with a rule or order to apply for ‘relief against sanctions’ under CPR 3.9. This rule has been strengthened under the Jackson reforms to make it more difficult to obtain relief. In Mitchell, the Court of Appeal held that from now on a sanction would be applied unless the breach of a rule or order had been trivial or there had been a ‘good reason’ for it (for example where a party or its solicitor had contracted a debilitating illness) and even then only if the application for relief had been made promptly.
Hogan Lovells summarises below cases where the courts have been applying the Mitchell ruling. In most cases, the judges seem to be at pains to point out that, from now on, things are going to be very different: there will be few hiding places for those who fail to comply with orders and rules…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump