The changing face of China's Civil Procedure Law: effects of the recent amendments
China’s recently amended Civil Procedure Law (CPL) will come into force on January 1, 2013. Below we outline some of the changes, also highlighting how some of them may impact intellectual property cases in Chinese courts.
Before the amendment, the CPL allows parties to a contract dispute to choose a forum, by written agreement, from a number of jurisdictions, such as the jurisdiction where the contract was executed. According to Article 34 of the amended CPL, it is now possible for parties in both contract and other property related disputes to agree on a jurisdiction in case of dispute. In addition, apart from listing the jurisdictions that parties may choose from as before, the wording of Article 34 also indicates that parties may choose other jurisdictions that have an actual connection with the dispute (although it does not clearly defined what “actual connection” means). All in all this means that there will be added possibilities to consider in terms of the choice of forum in property related disputes, including IP disputes…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Click on the link above to download briefing.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump