The big case of 2013: Covanta v Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority
The High Court’s decision in October to grant Covanta an injunction suspending the procurement of a long-term high-value waste disposal contract could mark a turning point for procurement challenges in the UK. Up until now, the courts have been loath to grant injunctions, instead preferring to award damages to the unsuccessful bidder. The Covanta case may signify a change in approach or it may be a one-off decision dependent on its particular facts.
The facts were not that unusual. In 2006, Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority (MWDA) began a procurement process for a new waste disposal facility. The contract is expected to last 30–35 years and cost more than £1bn. Seven years of competitive dialogue later, MWDA appointed SITA as its preferred bidder. Covanta, the unsuccessful bidder, was surprised to find out that despite more than six years of competitive dialogue MWDA had given two out of the five key elements of Covanta’s tender zero marks and described them as ‘fundamentally unacceptable’. Covanta claimed that there were manifest errors in the procurement process and sought an injunction to prevent MWDA entering into the contract with SITA.
The procurement had been going on so long that the applicable rules were not Regulation 47G of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended) (the automatic suspension remedy), but the usual American Cyanamid principles (named after the case that first set them out) for granting an injunction. In reality, the two sets of rules are similar so the same test applies…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When considered practically, the logical approach would be that a property is worth however much people are prepared to pay for it.
The degree and object of annexation were the key principles for the High Court to consider in the recent case of Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd and Libala Ltd.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.