The ban on fee-shifting bylaws is temporarily defeated — four points for public companies
The Delaware state senator responsible for introducing a proposed ban on fee-shifting bylaws has instead sponsored a resolution — unanimously passed in the Delaware state senate — to delay any vote on the proposed ban until 2015.
The delay, introduced on 18 June, came amid intense lobbying against the proposed legislative ban by the US Chamber of Commerce and reportedly at least one large Delaware-headquartered corporation. The proposed ban also enjoyed support from the governor of Delaware and, perhaps not coincidentally, a key Delaware shareholders’ trial lawyer and reported fundraiser for the governor.
What now? A principle reason that companies incorporate in Delaware is the certainty underlying Delaware corporate jurisprudence. While a fight over the ban has been put off for at least six months, public company boards of directors are left with a quandary. The Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in ATP Tours Inc v Deutscher Tennis Bund opened the door for fee-shifting bylaws as being ‘facially valid’, at least for non-stock corporations — and thus presumably regular stock-issuing corporations as well — subject to adoption by a board after due deliberation for a ‘valid corporate purpose’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper has released the 29 September 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
Facing the looming economic threat: third parties retain the right to intervene in threatened industrial action
Third parties have retained the recently acquired right to intervene to protect their interests in the face of threatened industrial action.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions