The availability of court documents after litigation has finished — CPR 31.22
Parties to litigation need to consider the risk that their commercially confidential information may be disclosed, either to the other side or to the general public in the course of the litigation.
Following Addleshaw Goddard’s general article last summer about how the rule that entitles non-parties to obtain copies of certain documents on the court file without the court’s permission, this article reviews recent decisions on later use of documents that have been disclosed.
CPR 31.22 contains a general prohibition on the use of disclosed documents: a party to whom a document has been disclosed may use it only for the purpose of the proceedings in which it is disclosed, unless one of the following exceptions applies…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages.
Data & Information E-Alerts — nuisance calls action plan; £50,000 fine for unlawful calls; simpler security classifications; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 4 April 2014 edition of its Data & Information E-Alerts publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.