The approach of the courts to challenges to LPA receiverships
The High Court case of (1) Jumani (2) Tariq v (1) Mortgage Express (2) Walker Singleton concerned a challenge to the continuing appointment of LPA receivers and is instructive of the approach the courts are taking to challenges to appointments.
The case concerned borrowers who had a buy-to-let portfolio with many of the properties mortgaged. The mortgage conditions provided that: ‘If you have more than one mortgage with us, and you want to pay off just one of those mortgages, we have the right… to stop you paying off the mortgages separately and to insist that you pay them all off.’
Following default, the bank appointed receivers. The receivers were the second defendants in the case (the bank being the first defendants)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
In the recent case of West v Ian Finlay & Associates, the Court of Appeal found that net contribution clauses ‘are by no means unusual’.
The Financial Reporting Council has published changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.