Tennessee Gas decision: oil and gas implications
By Brad Raffle
On 6 June 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled that FERC violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by improperly ‘segmenting’ its NEPA analysis of a four-part upgrade to Tennessee Gas Pipeline’s 300 Line System. The Tennessee Gas 300 Line connects the booming gas fields of western Pennsylvania to gas-hungry locations in the north-eastern US. The court held that FERC’s NEPA review needed to consider the project in its entirety, not on a segment-by-segment basis.
The Tennessee Gas decision has important ramifications for the US pipeline industry and other industries that construct complex multi-phased projects that are subject to NEPA. NEPA is often triggered by a federal agency’s approval of major construction activity, as was the case here. Where NEPA-affected projects entail segments that (1) overlap in time and (2) are functionally, physically and financially interrelated, environmental groups often argue that a NEPA review should focus extensively on the project as a whole, rather than each segment. The Tennessee Gas opinion will help to support this line of argument. The result could be more NEPA-related project delays for pipeline and other long-line construction projects that require federal approvals subject to NEPA.
Between 2010 and 2013, four pipeline upgrades were constructed along the entire eastern leg of the 300 Line. Tennessee Gas submitted and ultimately received FERC approval for all four upgrades as separate projects. FERC found that each segment was a standalone project and decided to review each of the four projects individually for NEPA purposes. Under this approach, FERC concluded that no single segment warranted the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS). An EIS, in contrast to the simpler environmental assessment used in this case by FERC, can significantly complicate and lengthen the overall NEPA review process. FERC clearly wanted to avoid this kind of delay in bringing needed natural gas to the north east…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
This article explores some current healthcare financing trends and speculates on what they may portend for work in a healthcare restructuring professional’s ‘pipeline’.
This broadcast station advisory highlights the upcoming deadlines for compliance with the FCC’s EEO rule.