Tenants’ goods — can I chuck them out?
By Anna Ralston
The scenarios are easy to imagine: it is mid-way through the term but the tenant has disappeared; the tenant has been in persistent breach of its lease and the landlord has forfeited the lease; or the term has ended and the tenant has moved out.
The tenant has left behind a number of items. What next? Can the landlord simply chuck them out? In short, the answer is no. This article will look at: the landlord’s responsibilities for the goods; the liabilities the landlord can face for disposing of the tenant’s property without following the proper procedures; and practical guidance for getting the premises back.
What has been left behind? The first thing the landlord should establish is exactly what items have been left behind. Are they chattels or fixtures? The law relating to fixtures and chattels is complex and a landlord should always seek specific legal advice…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem