Teckal companies pursuing ‘private’ interests, even those that are charitable, could fall outside of the exemption
The recent advocate-general (AG) opinion in Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal and SUCH v Eurest Portugal — Sociedade Europeia de Restaurantes Lda (Case C-574/12) provides further guidance on how not-for-profit organisations are treated under the Teckal exemption in public procurement.
As readers will be aware, the Teckal exemption allows contracting authorities to directly award a contract to a separate company without a procurement in certain circumstances. There are two main characteristics that must be satisfied by an organisation for the Teckal exemption to apply: (1) control — the contracting authority exercises a level of control over that organisation, which is similar to its control over its internal departments; and (2) function — that organisation is devoted principally to that contracting authority in the carrying out of its activities.
The AG focused on the control test in this recent case, which concerned a contract directly awarded to SUCH for the provision of hospital catering services…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories