Technical update: marshalling part two — Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency

Last week, Gateley commented on how marshalling has been under the spotlight following two recent cases: Highbury Pension Fund Management Company and Anor v Zirfin Investments Management Ltd and Ors and Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency (formerly the Serious Organised Crime Agency). By way of a reminder, marshalling is the ability of a secured creditor to take advantage of assets held under another creditor’s security where they are both owed a debt by the same person.

This week, Gateley looks at the second of these cases, Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency.

Is there an underlying debt? Last October, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the Serious Organised Crime Agency’s right to marshal a charge granted to the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) over a family home on the basis that there was no underlying debt…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.

Briefings from Gateley

View more briefings from Gateley

Analysis from The Lawyer


111 Edmund Street
B3 2HJ

Turnover (£m): 66.00
No. of Lawyers: 372