Taking it easy? High Court upholds 12-month garden leave clause
The defendant in JM Finn & Co Ltd v Holliday, a stockbroker, resigned with the intention of joining a competitor as soon as he could. Having received his letter of resignation, his employer exercised an express contractual right to place the defendant on garden leave and wanted to hold him to his 12-month contractual notice period. But, within a month the defendant resigned, claiming constructive dismissal, relying on the employer’s decision to stop providing him with daily email summaries of financial news as an alleged repudiatory breach of contract and indicating that he regarded himself as free to start employment with the competitor.
After the defendant failed to provide undertakings requested by his former employers, they instituted proceedings and asked the courts for an injunction to prevent him from joining his prospective new employer. An interim injunction was granted; the High Court then had to decide whether to extend that and, if so, for what period…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump