Takeover Panel extends scope of jurisdiction to non-UK-based AIM companies
By Iain Butler
More AIM companies are set to become subject to the provisions of the UK Takeover Code at the end of September 2013 as a result of changes published earlier this year.
Companies registered in the UK, Channel Islands or Isle of Man whose shares are admitted to trading on a UK-based multilateral trading facility such as AIM or ISDX’s Growth Market (formerly PLUS Markets), will fall within the scope of the UK Code on Takeovers and Mergers, even if their place of central management and control is overseas, with effect from 30 September 2013.
The change involves the removal of the so-called ‘residency test’ that has meant that AIM companies whose management was based outside the UK (even if they had a registered office in the UK, Channel Islands or Isle of Man) fell outside the jurisdiction of the Takeover Panel until now…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Supreme Court has held that a claimant’s right to recover a conditional fee agreement success fee and after the event insurance from an unsuccessful defendant is not contrary to the ECHR.
The existing Living Wage is already higher than the National Living Wage. What’s going on?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…