Sustainable urban drainage systems rules — delays could leave developers high and dry
The government continues to deliberate over how to implement the proposed rules on sustainable urban drainage systems (SuDS). Without guidance and clarity on what to expect, developers may be left high and dry as to the costs and requirements come the April 2014 deadline for the implementation of Schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010.
From April 2014 (in England), any construction works that have drainage implications will require approval before construction can begin.
However, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has still not provided the necessary technical guidance to accompany the legislation. The absence of such guidance makes it hard for industry to prepare for the proposed changes…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem