Survey evidence: first trademarks, now passing off
The courts have given guidance on the use of survey evidence in the context of trade mark proceedings. But what about passing off proceedings? A recent High Court decision has shed light on the issue.
We described in an earlier article the comments made by the Court of Appeal in Marks & Spencer plc v Interflora on the use of survey evidence. Those comments were made in the context of trademark infringement proceedings. The High Court has now addressed the same issue in the context of passing off proceedings.
In ZEE Entertainment Enterprises Ltd v Zeebox Ltd the claimant operated a number of television channels in the UK under the ZEE brand, principally targeting the British Asian community. The defendant was a developer who marketed an app for television viewers called Zeebox. The claimant instituted trademark and passing-off proceedings.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The Infrastructure Act is intended to boost investment in development projects. The practical and commercial implications of the new measures are wideranging.
In Andrew Parissis v Blair Court (St John’s Wood) Management, the judge in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) provided some useful guidance.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.