Supreme Court rules on misrepresentation in pre-contractual negotiations
In Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield and others  UKSC 9, the Supreme Court considered whether a party could be liable for a negligent pre-contractual misrepresentation in circumstances where the party to which the representation was originally made was not the ultimate contracting party. The court held that where there was a continuing representation that remained in effect until the contract was concluded, it may continue to have causative effect even where the contracting parties are not the same parties who made the statement or who the statement was originally intended for.
Ogilvie-Grant’s surveyor, Mr Kennedy, contacted Mr Erskine, who had previously expressed an interest in taking a lease of a grouse moor owned by Ogilvie-Grant. Mr Kennedy was employed to assist in attracting a tenant for the land. After visiting and shooting on the moor, Mr Erskine emailed Mr Kennedy expressing concern that the shooting planned for that season would leave an inadequate breeding population. Mr Erskine said that he was not qualified to quantify the damage that the shooting was doing to stocks, but he thought it was not insignificant. Mr Kennedy forwarded the email to Mr Lewis, Ogilvie-Grant’s chief executive, expressing his own view that the estate had been overshot to the extent that a lease might not be possible…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
InCredit — new rules on credit broking fees and financial promotions; FCA webpage on rules for loan-based crowdfunding platforms; CML responds on FPC direction powers
This edition includes new rules on credit broking fees, the Q3 SME lending stats and the European Banking Authority’s thoughts on credit institutions.
InCredit – FCA structural changes; speech by CEO of Competition & Markets Authority; PRA update on implementing BRRD; and more
Addleshaw Goddard’s weekly publication provides information on current retail finance issues, regulatory and legislative developments, market watch and ASA adjudications.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?