Supreme Court rules on misrepresentation in pre-contractual negotiations
In Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield and others  UKSC 9, the Supreme Court considered whether a party could be liable for a negligent pre-contractual misrepresentation in circumstances where the party to which the representation was originally made was not the ultimate contracting party. The court held that where there was a continuing representation that remained in effect until the contract was concluded, it may continue to have causative effect even where the contracting parties are not the same parties who made the statement or who the statement was originally intended for.
Ogilvie-Grant’s surveyor, Mr Kennedy, contacted Mr Erskine, who had previously expressed an interest in taking a lease of a grouse moor owned by Ogilvie-Grant. Mr Kennedy was employed to assist in attracting a tenant for the land. After visiting and shooting on the moor, Mr Erskine emailed Mr Kennedy expressing concern that the shooting planned for that season would leave an inadequate breeding population. Mr Erskine said that he was not qualified to quantify the damage that the shooting was doing to stocks, but he thought it was not insignificant. Mr Kennedy forwarded the email to Mr Lewis, Ogilvie-Grant’s chief executive, expressing his own view that the estate had been overshot to the extent that a lease might not be possible…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Court of Appeal in has considered the effect of a lease provision requiring a repeat guarantee as a condition of landlord’s consent on intragroup assignment.
Welcome to the latest edition of Addleshaw Goddard’s Employee Incentives Update, which contains a round-up of key developments in this area during August 2014.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.