Supreme Court rejects premise for GHG Tailoring Rule, but largely maintains EPA’s authority to set GHG emission limits
By Deborah E Jennings, Catherine B Campbell and Andrew B Schatz
In a split decision, the US Supreme Court confirmed the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) authority to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new and modified stationary sources that are required to obtain pre-construction and operating permits for non-GHG air pollutants. The EPA may thus require these sources to meet GHG emissions limitations.
The court also held in its 23 June decision that the EPA may not require a source to obtain a pre-construction or operating permit solely on the basis of its potential GHG emissions. See UARG v EPA.
The court’s decision upholds the EPA’s regulation of roughly 83 per cent of stationary-source GHG emissions under its permitting programme…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper’s privacy experts have compiled a list of dos and don’ts for addressing privacy compliance in M&A transactions.
On 22 July 2014, a new law amending the Law on Data Protection and Law on Information was signed off by the Russian president and thus was officially adopted.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions