Supreme Court makes encouraging noises for developers
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages. It has also confirmed the possibility of an easement for the right to emit noise and examined how relevant a planning permission is in an action for nuisance.
At the forefront of developers’ minds in recent years has been whether the courts will enforce rights of light by injunction (potentially to reduce the height of a planned building or to order it to be partially demolished) or damages (to compensate the party whose rights have been infringed).
Developers used to be able to agree compensation with the help of the select few specialist rights-of-light surveyors, and with little recourse to lawyers, but this approach was unseated by Regan v Paul Properties and HKRUK v Heaney…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Addleshaw Goddard has published this month’s round-up of developments affecting banks, wealth managers, brokers and funds.
Under the new system, eligible employees will have the right to share up to a maximum of 50 weeks’ leave and 37 weeks’ statutory pay with their partner.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?