Supreme Court in Actavis: analyse reverse-payment settlements' anticompetitive effects case by case
In a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court in FTC v Actavis held 5−3 that reverse-payment settlements of Hatch-Waxman Act litigation are neither immune from antitrust liability nor presumptively unlawful, but rather must be analysed under the rule-of-reason standard on a case-by-case basis.
In choosing the traditional antitrust standard, the decision rejected all lower-court approaches to these settlements and resolved a split between the Third Circuit — which had held such agreements presumptively unlawful — and the Eleventh, Second and Federal Circuits, which essentially had immunised the agreements as long as they fell within the exclusionary scope of the underlying patent.
Acknowledging that application of the rule of reason might require antitrust trial courts in some cases to determine the validity of the underlying patent, the court stated that such an occurrence should be rare because the size of the reverse payment can function as a ‘workable surrogate for the patent’s weakness’ (Slip Op. 19). Thus, the court directed trial judges to weigh the anticompetitive effects of a particular reverse payment by reference to ‘its size, its scale in relation to the payor’s anticipated future litigation costs, its independence from other services for which it might represent payment and the lack of any other convincing justification’ (Slip Op. 20)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Consumers who no longer wish to receive telemarketing messages from organisations can register their Singapore telephone numbers with the Do Not Call Registry.
This briefing includes a capsule review of the relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that were crafted to enhance corporate responsibility.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
Our list of the summer’s big deals shows how London law firms kept busy with work from Asia as well as more familiar sources