Supreme Court in Actavis: analyse reverse-payment settlements' anticompetitive effects case by case
In a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court in FTC v Actavis held 5−3 that reverse-payment settlements of Hatch-Waxman Act litigation are neither immune from antitrust liability nor presumptively unlawful, but rather must be analysed under the rule-of-reason standard on a case-by-case basis.
In choosing the traditional antitrust standard, the decision rejected all lower-court approaches to these settlements and resolved a split between the Third Circuit — which had held such agreements presumptively unlawful — and the Eleventh, Second and Federal Circuits, which essentially had immunised the agreements as long as they fell within the exclusionary scope of the underlying patent.
Acknowledging that application of the rule of reason might require antitrust trial courts in some cases to determine the validity of the underlying patent, the court stated that such an occurrence should be rare because the size of the reverse payment can function as a ‘workable surrogate for the patent’s weakness’ (Slip Op. 19). Thus, the court directed trial judges to weigh the anticompetitive effects of a particular reverse payment by reference to ‘its size, its scale in relation to the payor’s anticipated future litigation costs, its independence from other services for which it might represent payment and the lack of any other convincing justification’ (Slip Op. 20)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Cross-border work and political tensions are dominating this year’s entries for Finance Team of the Year at The Lawyer Awards.
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work