Supreme Court hands down decision on the joint appeals of Cheshire West and P&Q
By Laura Jolley
The Supreme Court has handed down the long-awaited judgment in relation to P v Cheshire West and Chester Council (& Ors) and P and Q v Surrey County Council (referred to in the judgment as MIG and MEG). The Lords agreed that P was deprived of his liberty and by a four-to-three majority decided that MIG and MEG were also deprived of their liberty.
The judgment will be of particular interest to clients struggling with the question as to whether or not someone is considered to be deprived of their liberty in relation to article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why