Supreme Court gives first judgment relating to the Mental Capacity Act 2005
In a case that raised significant questions about the best interests of a patient, the Supreme Court gave judgment on 30 October 2013 in relation to the end-of-life care of David James, a man who had died from his illness on 31 December 2012.
As readers will be aware, the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) broadly provides for decisions to be made on behalf of those aged 16 and over who are unable to make decisions for themselves. A core principle of the MCA is achieving the best interests of the person concerned.
The core of the case raised significant questions. When can it be in the best interests of Mr James to withhold treatment that would keep him alive? On the other hand, when can it be in his best interests to inflict severely invasive treatment upon him that will bring him next to no positive benefit? …
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why