Supreme Court denies chronic stress WCB claim after employee reacted to disciplinary letter
By Adrian Miedema
The Supreme Court of Canada has denied an employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits (WCB) for ‘chronic stress’, which he said resulted from a disciplinary letter that followed years of conflict over another workplace issue.
The employee, a park warden with Parks Canada, had for years argued that park wardens should be armed when carrying out law enforcement duties. He filed a health and safety complaint that generated internal complaint processes and a number of court cases and appeals.
Parks Canada received a request under access-to-information legislation and instructed the employee to disclose certain data on his work computer so that it could comply with the request. Parks Canada was not satisfied that he responded properly, so it gave him a letter notifying him that he would be disciplined if he did not provide an adequate response to the access-to-information request…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
ESMA follow-up papers address aspects of delegated legislation and technical standards to be made under MiFID 2 and MiFIR.
All Canadian businesses that are incorporated must complete an extra-provincial registration if they ‘carry on business’ in a province other than the jurisdiction of incorporation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive