Sunken vessel's owners commence court proceedings against insurers for indemnity
In an important judgment upholding the integrity and effectiveness of exclusive jurisdiction clauses generally and settlement agreements specifically, the Supreme Court, reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal, has held inter alia that a claim for breach of a settlement agreement and/or an exclusive jurisdiction clause will not attract a mandatory stay under article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
In May 2006, the Alexandros T sank off the shore of South Africa; her owners, Starlight Shipping Co, commenced proceedings in the Commercial Court against the vessel’s insurers for an indemnity. Starlight’s claims were settled by agreements concluded in December 2007 and January 2008, and the English proceedings were stayed pursuant to consent Tomlin orders. Previously, Starlight had applied for permission to amend its particulars of claim, to plead a claim for damages for late payment of the insurance indemnity; Tomlinson J refused permission on the basis of the rule in Sprung v Royal Insurance  Lloyd’s Rep IR 111 that an insurer commits no breach of contract or duty sounding in damages for failure promptly to pay an insurance claim.
More than three years later, in April 2011, Starlight and various affiliated companies and individuals commenced nine actions, pleaded in materially identical terms, against the insurers and their legal representatives, among others. Starlight’s claims in Greece were for damages for alleged breaches of the Greek civil and criminal codes relating to the insurers’ handling of Starlight’s claim under the insurance policies and to the insurers’ conduct in defending the prior Commercial Court proceedings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the 7KBW briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from 7KBW
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from 7KBW
An apparently normal case, a dispute under a share transfer agreement (STA), resulted in an unusual outcome in commercial litigation — a successful claim for rectification, won by 7KBW’s Robert Bright QC.
As an alternative to an anti-suit injunction, the Commercial Court confirms that an award of damages for breach of an English jurisdiction clause is compatible with EU law.