Subsidies for green electricity permitted to restrict trade between EU member states — CJEU
By Adam Brown
It is normal for member states to make support for renewable generation available only to generators based in their own territory. Until recently, it was generally assumed that this was entirely consistent with EU law. Article 3(3) of the EU Renewables Directive (2009/28/EC) states that member states ‘shall have the right to decide… to which extent they support energy from renewable sources that is produced in a different member state’.
However, a case referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) by the Swedish courts called this into question. Ålands Vindkraft, the operator of a wind farm in the Åland Islands, applied to participate in the Swedish ‘green certificate’ scheme. Although connected to the Swedish grid, the project was in Finnish territory, and its application was refused on that ground, pursuant to the relevant Swedish law.
As well as the question whether that law was in line with the directive, the resulting appeal to the Swedish courts raised a more fundamental issue. Are schemes that restrict the availability of subsidy to home-grown renewables, and the provisions of the directive that ostensibly permit such restrictions, consistent with the EU treaties’ rules on the free movement of goods? …
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine has adopted a set of laws designed to create a legislative framework to fight corruption and money laundering in Ukraine.
McCarthy v Marks & Spencer plc focused on the following two avenues of claim: negligence at common law and the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive