Subject access requests — High Court judgment
The application was made by Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd (SPPLL), a member of the Lehman Brothers group of companies that had gone into voluntary liquidation. The company had used a third-party company to process data relating to the loans it made, which the third party continued to hold. SPPLL had been receiving approximately 88 subject access requests (SARs) per week since liquidation, which were costing it around £40,000 per month to deal with.
The SARs were being made on behalf of former customers with a view to determining whether or not they had a claim to compensation over the mis-selling of PPI. The liquidators applied to the High Court for declaratory relief hoping to be able to refuse future SARs and enable the liquidators to dispose of any data no longer required for the third party’s business purposes.
They argued that the cost of complying with SARs was unfairly reducing the amount available to creditors. A number of interesting points were made in the ruling…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
The Düsseldorf Court of Appeal has referred questions to the CJEU on whether the supply of patent-protected substances by a third party to a generic company is covered by the Bolar exemption.
This is only the second time that the Data Protection Index has featured in Global Intellectual Property Index, yet a number of trends are already apparent from the results.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town