Strike out — getting rid of companies that are no longer required
Got a company you no longer need? Maybe it’s a group subsidiary that ceased trading long ago or a vehicle set up for a joint venture that never got off the starting blocks. Perhaps it’s time to think about getting rid of the company, freeing yourself of the ongoing burden of administration that comes with all corporate entities.
Every company, even a dormant one, is required to: (1) file an annual return at Companies House each year, accompanied by the relevant fee; (2) file accounts at Companies House each year (subject to certain exceptions for wholly owned group subsidiaries where the parent agrees to guarantee all the liabilities of the subsidiary); and (3) maintain various company records.
While these requirements are not overly burdensome, they can easily be forgotten where the company is dormant. The company could incur penalties where documents are not filed and the directors will continue to be subject to fiduciary duties and other potential liabilities…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in the Woolworths and Ethel Austin cases introduced an alternative interpretation to the meaning of ‘one establishment’.
If a name is included on the form and the individual does not have a genuine conflict of interest the decision could be unenforceable.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.