Stepping back in time with receiverships
We are all familiar with the court’s power to make retrospective administration orders, what is often termed a ‘G-Tech Order’ after the seminal case. It was, however, unclear whether this principle would also carry into the sphere of receivership appointments. A judgment recently handed down in the Northern Irish courts suggests that indeed it does.
The case of Bank of Ireland v Edeneast Ltd centred on the scope of (the Northern Ireland equivalent of) the Insolvency Act 1986 (section 35). This section provides that a receiver may apply to the court for directions in relation to any particular matter arising in connection with the performance of the functions of the receiver. On such an application, the court may give such directions as it thinks fit.
The ‘receiver’ was appointed as receiver and manager in May 2010 but his authority to act as such was expressed to expire on 1 March 2011. Unfortunately, this limitation was not appreciated until some two years after the expiry date. During this period of time, the receiver had purported to continue acting as receiver and manager of certain licensed premises…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
Was the dismissal of Liverpool’s mayor fair, when he didn’t carry out any of his day-job duties but was still entitled to be paid?
Courts will only imply a duty of good faith into a commercial contract in very limited circumstances so if the parties intend it to contain such a duty it should be expressly set out.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.