Stepping back in time with receiverships
We are all familiar with the court’s power to make retrospective administration orders, what is often termed a ‘G-Tech Order’ after the seminal case. It was, however, unclear whether this principle would also carry into the sphere of receivership appointments. A judgment recently handed down in the Northern Irish courts suggests that indeed it does.
The case of Bank of Ireland v Edeneast Ltd centred on the scope of (the Northern Ireland equivalent of) the Insolvency Act 1986 (section 35). This section provides that a receiver may apply to the court for directions in relation to any particular matter arising in connection with the performance of the functions of the receiver. On such an application, the court may give such directions as it thinks fit.
The ‘receiver’ was appointed as receiver and manager in May 2010 but his authority to act as such was expressed to expire on 1 March 2011. Unfortunately, this limitation was not appreciated until some two years after the expiry date. During this period of time, the receiver had purported to continue acting as receiver and manager of certain licensed premises…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
New guidance has been published in relation to the instruction of experts in civil claims.
A shadow director may be someone who is openly involved in managing a company or someone who lurks ‘in the shadows’ behind the scenes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.