Statutory charges and the Steigrad litigation — who, what and why
Litigation involving directors of the Bridgecorp group and QBE is still on foot. Directors of the failed Bridgecorp group have claimed indemnity from QBE in respect of their defence costs. At first instance, the directors were unsuccessful (Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Ltd  NZHC 1037). An appeal by one of the directors — Steigrad — was successful (Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Ltd  NZCA 604). The Supreme Court of New Zealand has granted leave to appeal this decision.
At the centre of this litigation is the statutory charge provisions found in the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ) section 9. Similar legislation exists in NSW, ACT and NT. The legislation does two things. It throws a ‘net’ over certain moneys that are or may be payable under an insurance policy. It also permits certain third parties (subject, in some cases, to obtaining the leave of the court) to recover those moneys by proceedings against an insurer in the same way as they might have proceeded against the insured. In this way, the provisions protect third parties who might be unable to recover from an insured and prevent insurance moneys from being distributed to other creditors of the insured…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Australia treasurer Joe Hockey has announced the removal of foreign investment conditions placed on Yanzhou in relation to its holding in Yancoal.
An in-depth understanding of the unique legal environment in China is essential to fully understand compliance requirements.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out