Standing alongside your insured — when an insurer will have a common interest

By Chern Tan and Catherine Hamilton-Jewell

In Marshall v Prescott [2013] NSWCA 152, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered the issue of common interest privilege and when insurers and insureds are likely to have a ‘self-same’ interest in proceedings.

The court found that a common interest currently in existence will not be lost if it is possible that the parties’ interests may diverge in the future. This is an important decision for insureds and insurers who often need to share legal documents and strategy with each other (and often before final decisions in relation to indemnity are made), allowing both parties a greater level of comfort in doing so.

The court also endorsed a three-step process for determining whether a common interest exists…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.


Level 40, Governor Macquarie Tower
1 Farrer Place

Jurisdiction: Australia
No. of offices: 14
No. of qualified lawyers: 1085