Standing alongside your insured — when an insurer will have a common interest
By Chern Tan and Catherine Hamilton-Jewell
In Marshall v Prescott  NSWCA 152, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered the issue of common interest privilege and when insurers and insureds are likely to have a ‘self-same’ interest in proceedings.
The court found that a common interest currently in existence will not be lost if it is possible that the parties’ interests may diverge in the future. This is an important decision for insureds and insurers who often need to share legal documents and strategy with each other (and often before final decisions in relation to indemnity are made), allowing both parties a greater level of comfort in doing so.
The court also endorsed a three-step process for determining whether a common interest exists…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
News from Minter Ellison
Briefings from Minter Ellison
After launching the Shanghai pilot free-trade zone nine months ago, the Shanghai government has released the 2014 Negative List.
The Federal Circuit Court of Australia imposed fines on a company totalling AUD313,500 for sham contracting and related contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009.