Sports broadcasting, gambling advertising and live odds — is further regulation needed?
By Nick Fitzpatrick and Dylan Kennett
Of the many Australian traditions, there is one that unifies the country irrespective of background and geographical location — sitting down to Friday-night footy with friends and family. It is quite clearly a national pastime whose roots run deep and is sacrosanct in the eyes of many. Currently, there is a conversation being had as to the role of gambling, specifically the advertising of gambling in Australian sports.
The focal point of much of the ire of the public had been on Tom Waterhouse, owner of tomwaterhouse.com, one of the more popular online betting websites available to Australians. Online gambling was nothing new, but the levels of intrusion into Friday night football was getting too much for many Australians to handle. Waterhouse was often involved in match punditry, providing odds on the game itself, as well as upcoming horseraces. Complaints were made and Nine Network moved Waterhouse to a sponsored role, where on the sidelines, he would provide the odds. Nonetheless, gambling, advertising and Australian sports, (most notably rugby league and the AFL) had become inextricably linked.
In late April, Free TV Australia, (the industry body which represents all of Australia’s commercial free-to-air television licencees) submitted a proposal to amend the Commercial Television Code of Practice to prohibit commentators and their guests promoting live odds during matches. It did not go as far as to ban sponsored segments to promote odds when games were not in play, such as advertising breaks. Tom Waterhouse would no longer serve as a pundit, but could quite clearly still advertise during the football…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The interpretation of the scope of application of the investor’s right to withdraw from any contracts for the placement of door-to-door financial products has again captured the attention of all players.
Tax Newsletter — July/August 2014: SAT strengthens reporting request under China CFC rules; and more
DLA Piper has released the July/August edition of its Tax Newsletter, which provides a review of PRC and Hong Kong tax developments.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions