Specsavers — missing words and black and white marks

By Roland Mallinson

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled in the Specsavers v Asda case that, where a CTM device mark is only used in combination with another element — for example adorned with a word — such use can still amount to genuine use of the unadorned device mark. This applies, however, only if the adorning element does not change the distinctive character of the CTM device mark. The CJEU added that is makes no difference if the combination mark (device and adorning element) is separately registered.

In the context of the Specsavers case, the Court of Appeal now has to decide if use of the device mark with ‘Specsavers’ is genuine use of the wordless mark or if the addition of ‘Specsavers’ changes the distinctive character of wordless mark. The High Court had said it was not genuine use of the wordless mark…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

  • Money 317

    Crunch boom

    Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of Lawyers: 860
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 79
Offices (Asia Pacific): 3