Specsavers — missing words and black and white marks
By Roland Mallinson
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled in the Specsavers v Asda case that, where a CTM device mark is only used in combination with another element — for example adorned with a word — such use can still amount to genuine use of the unadorned device mark. This applies, however, only if the adorning element does not change the distinctive character of the CTM device mark. The CJEU added that is makes no difference if the combination mark (device and adorning element) is separately registered.
In the context of the Specsavers case, the Court of Appeal now has to decide if use of the device mark with ‘Specsavers’ is genuine use of the wordless mark or if the addition of ‘Specsavers’ changes the distinctive character of wordless mark. The High Court had said it was not genuine use of the wordless mark…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
The Düsseldorf Court of Appeal has referred questions to the CJEU on whether the supply of patent-protected substances by a third party to a generic company is covered by the Bolar exemption.
This is only the second time that the Data Protection Index has featured in Global Intellectual Property Index, yet a number of trends are already apparent from the results.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town