Specsavers — missing words and black and white marks
By Roland Mallinson
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled in the Specsavers v Asda case that, where a CTM device mark is only used in combination with another element — for example adorned with a word — such use can still amount to genuine use of the unadorned device mark. This applies, however, only if the adorning element does not change the distinctive character of the CTM device mark. The CJEU added that is makes no difference if the combination mark (device and adorning element) is separately registered.
In the context of the Specsavers case, the Court of Appeal now has to decide if use of the device mark with ‘Specsavers’ is genuine use of the wordless mark or if the addition of ‘Specsavers’ changes the distinctive character of wordless mark. The High Court had said it was not genuine use of the wordless mark…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
With technological developments and the increase of CCTV in public places, the role of regulation and guidance will become increasingly important.
There have been some high-profile cases involving the use of CCTV in Germany in recent years.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town