Spanish competition authorities impose fines of €43m for price fixing on Valencia Port Authority and others
On 2 October 2013, the Spanish Competition Commission (SCC) published a press release stating that it had imposed fines of €43m (£36m) on five business associations, three companies and the Valencia Port Authority for having fixed prices and shared markets in the market for road transport by container from Valencia Harbour over a period of 13 years.
Three business associations — ATEIA-OLT VALENCIA, AELTC and TRANSCONVAL — received the highest fines: €13m, €12.7m and €9.9m respectively.
The SCC also found that the Valencia regional authority was not only involved but actually had a leading role in the infringement. In October 2011, in the Uva & Mosto case, the SCC had already indicated that it was ready to impose fines on any public authorities that participated in competition law infringements. However, according to the text published by the SCC, it appears that the Valencia regional authority has not been fined in this case…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The most important advantage of international arbitration is the enforceability of its result, as a deal is only as reliable as the mechanism by which it can be made legally enforceable.
The Court of Appeal decision in CLP Holding Company Ltd v Singh (1) Kaur (2) prompts consideration of a common oversight in dealing with dilapidations claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe