Something or nothing? Government to consult on zero-hours contracts
Following widespread press coverage over the summer, the business secretary has announced that there will be a consultation on zero-hours contracts and has pledged to address any abuses revealed by this consultation.
Vince Cable’s statement mentions four ‘particular areas of concern’ arising out of an initial review: exclusivity; transparency; earning/benefits uncertainty; and balance of power.
The statement does not mention the wider issue of employment status and it is not clear to what extent the consultation will tackle this. Zero-hours contracts appear to lack one of the essential requirements for employee status — mutuality of obligation — but following the 2011 Supreme Court decision in Autoclenz v Belcher, tribunals are prepared to look beyond the terms of a written agreement to see if it reflects the true nature of the relationship, particularly for roles where there is some inequality of bargaining power between the parties…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump